A break in the clouds
Difficulties in the wider economy have not spread to the
weather markets, which seem to have succeeded in attracting
more end-user business, reports Christopher Cundy
 |
| Rising crop prices are putting more cash at risk |
Soaring commodity prices and a lending
crisis have cast a shadow over the
global economy, but the weather risk markets
have, it seems, escaped unscathed – and maybe
even benefited.
The higher cost of energy and agricultural
produce has raised the stakes on how the
weather will impact the buyers and sellers of
these commodities. With a larger income at
risk and more volatile prices, potential users of
weather derivatives should be better able to
justify the cost of hedging, say dealers. Meanwhile,
investors looking for assets that are uncorrelated
with stocks and bonds are also
increasingly turning to the weather markets.
Figures from the Chicago Mercantile Exchange
(CME), the leading marketplace for
weather derivatives, show a dramatic leap in
futures and options volumes, up 39% in the
first quarter of 2008 compared with the
previous
year, to almost half a million contracts, according
to director of alternative investments
Felix Carabello. Dealers and brokers on the
whole are optimistic, but are tending to report
steady, rather than stunning, growth in the US
and a generally flat market in Europe.
Notable, however, is a reported rise in
end-user business. Carabello attributes the
greater volumes on the exchange to “more
end-user interest coming into the market” and
two firms that began operating last year –
Storm Exchange and WeatherBill – both report
success in convincing virgin end-users of the
value of weather risk management.
The energy sector continues to provide
the bulk of business for the market.“It’s where
the greatest understanding of weather risk lies.
It gives you a very good concentration of people
who know what they’re talking about,” says
Dan Tomlinson, London-based director at
Galileo Weather Risk Management, a division
of the White Mountains Insurance Group.
Agricultural businesses have historically
not been so receptive to the concept, at least
in comparison to the energy sector, but it appears
dealers are having some success in pushing
back this frontier.
Stephen Doherty, CEO of Speedwell Associates,
a UK-based provider of data and risk
management systems, says agriculture-linked
deals are becoming bigger business, especially
in the US. “We see more and more of our business
in collecting data for those doing agricultural
weather deals.” But he describes the
growth as gradually building rather than coming
in leaps and bounds.
Storm Exchange CEO David Riker says he
has targeted the agricultural sector and is seeing
“phenomenal demand”, not just from farmers
but also from processors, suppliers and
equipment manufacturers. “A lot of it has been
driven by price volatility. There’s also a great
fear of the ‘big drought’,” he says.
Houston-based RenRe Investment Managers
has most of its clients in the energy sector
but is exploring deals for agricultural
concerns, says Bill Windle.
Windle says the deals he structures are becoming
more complex, as they aim to mitigate
as closely as possible the underlying risk for
the farmer – namely that crop yields are less
than expected.“ Agricultural exposures are becoming
more specific. There are more inputs
into the risk calculation than rain and temperature,”
he says,without elaborating.
Agricultural weather risk management
has gained traction in some
developing countries, notably
India, where hundreds of thousands
of subsistence farmers have, with backing
from national and regional governments,
taken out weather-linked insurance on loans
which covers their repayments in the event of
drought and crop failure. However, in dollar
terms the markets are small – although with
obvious growth potential.
The World Food Programme (WFP), winner
of last year’s Environmental Finance weather
risk management deal of the year award for a
famine protection deal in Ethiopia with Paris
Re (see Environmental Finance, September 2007,
page 35), is looking to structure a “real solution”
that builds on that pilot exercise, says Ulrich
Hess, chief of business risk planning at the
WFP in Italy. “We want to be back in the market
with a three-year facility.”
Work is continuing on developing an underlying
index and the exact coverage, but the
deal depends on raising the premium money
and gaining support from the international
donor community. “Governments were happy
with the pilot deal. But now they are a bit stand
off-ish,” Hess says.
|